Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Action Plan

William M. Anderson Elementary School
Technology Action plan

Purpose: To train every faculty member in our campus how to use technology to enhance learning and instruction. Technology must be use as much as possible during instruction in order to be successful teaching 21st Century students.


Analysis of Need: After reviewing the Texas Long-Range Technology Plan, Campus STaR Chart, Dallas ISD and William M. Anderson improvement plan, AEIS reports, and AYP results I have come to the conclusion that our campus needs more technology infrastructure, educator preparation, and teaching & learning.

Propose Actions: This action plan is to develop several training sessions on how to use technology effectively in the classroom and to find out what areas we more technology training for the future.

Goal 1: Staff development of new technology.
· The Dallas ISD will provide appropriate staff development and professional growth for all administration, faculty, and staff.
· Provide several trainings in a month so that teachers can attend any training during that period.

Goal 2: Increase the amount of technology in all classrooms.
· Have every teacher on campus implement the new technology into classrooms effectively.
· Students will be engaged by using more technology.

Goal 3: Technology infrastructure.
· Have the district provide computers for every classroom so that every teacher has access to technology.
· Provide more computers for students as well.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

The Texas Teacher STaR Chart: Educator Preparation and Development

I think that the Texas Teacher STaR Chart is a very useful tool in helping teachers to integrate technology effectively across the curriculum. In fact, the Texas Teacher STaR Chart assists teachers in determining professional development needs based on a current educational technology proļ¬le. Also, the Texas Teacher STaR Chart helps conceptualize the campus or district vision of technology as well as assisting campuses in documenting the use of No Child Left Behind and discretionary funds.
The chart is composed of four areas of the new long plan which show levels of progress ranging from Early Tech to Target Tech. The area that caught my attention the most is the area of Educator preparation and development. The campus statewide summary shows that developing tech and advanced tech for educator preparation and development increased from the previous year. In fact, in the 2007-2008 school year the developing tech for the campus statewide jumped from 74% to 74.2%. Also, the advanced technology for the same area increased from 17% to 19.9% during the same year.
Furthermore, locally within our campus we increased in educator preparation and development from 10 points to 12 during the 2007-2008 school year. My recommendation for improving this area in my campus will be to use more technology for administrative tasks, classroom management, and the use of online resources. Having our campus educators to implement more the use of technology will increase academic achievement for every student.